SC stays death warrant in Gujarat rape-murder case | Latest News India - Hindustan Times
close_game
close_game

SC stays death warrant in Gujarat rape-murder case

Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By
Feb 21, 2020 12:45 AM IST

Anil Surendrasingh Yadav was sentenced to death by a special court in July 2019 under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, or POCSO.

The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the hanging of a man convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a three-year-old girl in Surat, Gujarat, accepting the convict’s argument that the black warrants for the execution had been issued before he had exhausted his legal remedies.

The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the hanging of a man convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a three-year-old girl in Surat(Sonu Mehta/HT PHOTO)
The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the hanging of a man convicted and sentenced to death for the rape and murder of a three-year-old girl in Surat(Sonu Mehta/HT PHOTO)

Anil Surendrasingh Yadav was sentenced to death by a special court in July 2019 under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, or POCSO.

Hindustan Times - your fastest source for breaking news! Read now.

“Until further orders, there shall be a stay of executing the sentence of death against the petitioner”, the Supreme Court ruled.

According to the prosecution, Yadav who was staying in a room situated on the ground floor of a house had, in October 2018, kidnapped the child staying with her family on the first floor of the same house. Yadav took the girl to his room, raped her and killed her by throttling her. He then put the body of the girl in a gunny bag, locked the room from outside and ran away. The body was later discovered by the police in a decayed and decomposed condition.

The Gujarat high court had upheld the conviction and death sentence of Yadav in December 2019.

Subsequently, the district court had, in January, issued a warrant for Yadav’s hanging on February 29.

Yadav challenged the high court judgment in Supreme Court and sought a stay on the execution. Advocate Aparajita Singh, appearing for Yadav, pointed out that the district court issued a black warrant before the expiry of 60 days, the period mandated by the Supreme Court to appeal against judgments of a high court.

Singh cited the 2015 judgment of the Supreme Court in the Shabnam v. Union of India case in which the apex court had ruled that a death sentence cannot be executed in an arbitrary, hurried and secret manner without allowing convicts to exhaust all their legal remedies.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) SA Bobde concurred with the argument made by Singh. He expressed surprise at the manner in which the trial court had gone about issuing a death warrant before the convict could exhaust his legal remedies. The CJI asked solicitor general Tushar Mehta, who was present in court, in another case to look into the matter

“How are black warrants issued before the period of limitation is exhausted? How can judicial process go on like this”, the CJI asked.

Delays in the execution of death penalty convicts has been a subject of intense debate in the past few weeks after the hanging of the four convicts in the 2012 Delhi gang rape-and-murder case was postponed twice because the convicts hadn’t exhausted their legal remedies.

This prompted the central government to approach the Supreme Court, seeking guidelines to ensure timely execution of death row convicts. The Supreme Court also issued directions by way of an office order on February 12 in a bid to expedite the hearings in death penalty cases.

The court, in its office order, said that it will list for hearing appeals from high courts challenging death penalty sentences within six months of the date on which the matter is admitted for hearing.

Such appeals will be listed before three-judge bench within six months irrespective of whether all documents and records relating to the case have been filed or not. The officer order also laid down deadlines for obtaining records of the case from high courts and for parties to file additional documents.

The order stated that as soon as an appeal involving the death penalty is filed, a communication will be sent to the concerned high court by the Supreme Court registry calling for the original records of the case within 60 days. This includes translation of documents which are in a vernacular language.

Once the Supreme Court admits the matter, additional documents should be filed by parties within 30 days of the date on which Registry informs the parties of the fact.

Unveiling Elections 2024: The Big Picture', a fresh segment in HT's talk show 'The Interview with Kumkum Chadha', where leaders across the political spectrum discuss the upcoming general elections. Watch now!

Get Current Updates on India News, Election 2024, Arvind Kejriwal News Live, Bihar Board 10th Result 2024 Live along with Latest News and Top Headlines from India and around the world.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON
Share this article
SHARE
Story Saved
Live Score
OPEN APP
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Thursday, March 28, 2024
Start 14 Days Free Trial Subscribe Now
Follow Us On